Introduction

After more than a year of planning, organizing, and mobilizing, RightsCon 2026 was scheduled to take place in Zambia from May 5 to 8, 2026. In our official statement, we outlined the series of events that led to the effective cancellation of RightsCon by the Government of Zambia and provided additional context around this decision. 

We were devastated to not deliver the summit we had carefully planned and designed alongside the digital rights community, especially our partners in Zambia and the region. In the weeks since publishing our statement, we have received an overwhelming outpouring of support and solidarity from across the community, including participants, sponsors, session organizers, media, and fellow event organizers. 

In an unprecedented moment, we turned to the community to ask fundamental questions that could help chart the path forward for RightsCon, both this year and in the years ahead. The response was beyond anything we could have imagined: more than 1,400 community members shared invaluable feedback, comments, and suggestions. For us, these responses illustrate both the resilience of the digital rights community and its willingness to come together in difficult moments.

On this page, we share key insights from the survey, including areas for further information gathering and exploration, general preferences, and ideas raised by the community. We also offer some initial reflections on what RightsCon could look like in 2026 and beyond.

Survey Results

We are incredibly grateful for the time, care, and thoughtfulness our community brought to this process in sharing their stories, perspectives, ideas, and suggestions with us. We read every single response and recognize how much RightsCon means to the digital rights movement, and we want to be transparent and forthcoming in sharing the full survey results and our initial reflections with the community.

Community demographics

Impact

Pathways for 2026

Looking at our current model

What the community had to say

The quantitative results above provide a broad overview of the community’s opinions and perspectives. However, to gain a deeper understanding of participants’ contexts, individual experiences, and reflections, we also conducted a qualitative analysis of the survey responses.

Out of the 1,408 replies, 647 participants took the time to provide additional written feedback. Our team carefully reviewed every submission below and we broke down the main themes that emerged. We grouped them into 5 high-level categories: Constructive feedback and improvement suggestions (311 replies), Positive feedback and affirmations (243 replies), Challenges, requests and other feelings (87 replies), Questions and clarifications (20 replies), and Other (60 replies).

The majority of comments we received fell into the Constructive feedback and improvement suggestions category, encompassing topics like the location selection process, location suggestions, thoughts on our cadence and timing, reflections on the RightsCon model, programmatic suggestions, interest or suggestions for RightsCon in 2026, and communication and community suggestions.

Positive feedback and affirmations were the second biggest category with messages of support and heartfelt testimonials from participants. Challenges, requests and other feelings highlighted the financial impacts, requests for financial support, and grievances and complaints. Questions and clarifications were mostly related to refund inquiries and requests for more clarification on the situation in Zambia.

Below you can find a few community quotes from some of the most recurring themes we found in the replies:


On our region rotation model

“As much as discovering new countries and cultures is also part of the experience, ensuring the smooth operation of the conference should be the main focus. For this reason, maybe the team should revisit the idea of organising it every year in the same place.” 

“I understand the importance of rotating continents, and as someone from Latin America, I know that some venues can be quite expensive to reach. Strengthening local communities is essential, and hosting RightsCon within their own regions can be a powerful way to do that. Perhaps you could consider alternating formats—holding a larger, centralized conference every two years in a fixed location, and in the intervening years, organizing a smaller event that rotates across continents. (RC Asia, RC Africa and so on).”

“Exploring hybrid or decentralized models, such as regional hubs or parallel local convenings, could help ensure continuity and inclusivity even in uncertain situations. This would allow participants, particularly from underrepresented regions, to still engage meaningfully despite global or political constraints”


On our location selection process

“While the postponement of RightsCon in Zambia is disappointing, it also highlights the significance and impact of digital rights work. Reactions of this scale often indicate that the issues being addressed are both relevant and influential, which suggests progress in the right direction.

That said, this situation points to the need for a more nuanced, context-specific political analysis when planning such events. Beyond formal stakeholder engagement, it is important to understand the informal power structures and underlying decision-making dynamics within host countries, as those not always visible may ultimately shape outcomes.

This setback should not deter efforts to host RightsCon in Africa. The continent remains a critical space for these conversations, and future attempts should continue, with strengthened contextual awareness and strategic planning.

“I would encourage RightsCon to strengthen risk assessment and contingency planning, particularly when hosting in politically sensitive contexts, to avoid last-minute disruptions of this scale. Clearer and earlier communication with participants would also help mitigate the financial and logistical impact on attendees, especially those traveling long distances.


On ways to strengthen the ecosystem and keep the community engaged

“I am so disappointed [that RightsCon 2026 in Zambia] fell apart in the end and do hope that some online convenings still happen – it can still have an impact to move things forward. Maybe not as a conference per se with everything happening at once but lots of scheduled convenings throughout the calendar on different topics? Also some sort of online community where we can share news and opportunities, and get together in trusted, private spaces.”

“There is an opportunity to shift from convening conversations to strengthening ecosystems. This means supporting regional and local infrastructures where dialogue, strategy, and action are already happening—sometimes informally, often without visibility, but with deep relevance to communities. It also means recognizing that participation should not be defined by the ability to attend a global event, but by the ability to shape agendas from where people are. There is also space to rethink how continuity is held. Many of the relationships and ideas that emerge around RightsCon risk losing momentum without a structure to sustain them. Supporting year-round engagement—through regional networks, collaborative platforms, and shared spaces for ongoing exchange—could ensure that the energy of the community does not depend on a single moment in time.”


On strategies to host RightsCon in 2026

“I am not sure it is realistic to try to pull off a 2026 Rights Con in person given global conditions including those tied to air travel. However, in line with what some major conferences did during COVID an option could be to schedule some RightsCon events and panels online. A particular theme area could be allocated a particular day of the week to make it easier for people to watch.”

“If possible, I would suggest hosting RightsCon in alignment with MozFest 2026 in Barcelona/Spain (late October or early November 2026) or before the Internet Governance Forum in Nairobi in December 2026.

“Authoritarianism is testing us but this is our moment to decide who we are. We can retreat into silence, or we can stand firm and push forward with conviction. Rescheduling RightsCon 2026 is not just logistics; it is resistance. […] And to our community, it says this: we do not shrink under pressure; we rise, we organize, and we come back stronger”

Reflections and looking ahead

For years, we have worked alongside partners to push back against digital authoritarianism and to protect those most affected by it. What happened here reinforces why that work matters and why spaces like RightsCon are essential. We will ensure that the conversations, connections, and actions that were meant to happen do not disappear, but continue in ways that are deliberate, resilient, and harder to constrain.

Keep up to date with RightsCon

Sign up for our newsletter to get updates on our next steps.
Get in touch with us at [email protected]